Wednesday, March 16, 2005
YOU MUST REMEMBER THIS
But my soft-hearted empathetic inner child (it must be there somewhere) feels for those can't remember their passwords. And my common-sensical self connects with this observation:
[T]he logical conclusion of most strong password policies ... is that passwords should be impossible to remember and should never be written down.And my jargon fascination doppelganger digs the lingo: risk homeostasis, danger compensation, risk-offsetting behavior, perverse compensation. Might I suggest a new term? Lazyasses.Somehow, the world's ATM banking systems have managed to get by with a bare minimum of fraud for more than 20 years by relying upon only four-digit codes. So what do the banking geeks grasp about password management?
The obvious answer: the stronger and more complex the password scheme, the lazier and more technically incompetent the security system administrator.
2 Comments:
Not to disagree with your apparent disdain of strong passwords, but the ATM also requires physical possession of the bank card. That adds considerably to the security of the situation. I also use a 4 digit PIN to login to my corporate accounts form home but that is supplemented by an RSA SecureID token.
I believe Bruce Schneier (Cryptogram) talks about three concepts in security: something I am (fingerprints, retinal scans, etc.), something I know (password), something I have (ATM card, SecureID token). Using more than one of these increments the security level of the system. A normal login only uses one - the password. An ATM transaction uses two - the card and the PIN.
By 10:26 AM
, atAs long as I can keep my disdain I'll bow to your superior knowledge.